Posted Jun 16, 2005 7:57 UTC (Thu) by jamesh (subscriber, #1159)
[Link]
Listing the license isn't that bad an idea given the recent BitKeeper fiasco. It tells you that (a) anyone can use it, and (b) it won't stop working all of a sudden some time down the road. Secondly, the website doesn't say anything about the ordering of the "vital facts".
Of course, you should do more than look at a feature list when picking a source code management system ...
Bazaar-NG: a distributed version control system
Posted Jun 16, 2005 15:21 UTC (Thu) by daniel (subscriber, #3181)
[Link]
Beware any project that lists two implementation details and a license as its three foremost features.
I will a fourth detail then: the project lead is the same Martin Pool who is responsible for distcc.