| Weekly edition | Kernel | Security | Distributions | Search |
| Archives | Calendar | Subscribe | Write for LWN | LWN.net FAQ |
Fedora Extras
Fedora Extras
Posted Jun 9, 2005 11:09 UTC (Thu) by jwboyer (subscriber, #23296)In reply to: Fedora Extras by corbet
Parent article: A tale of two distributions
Debian and Gentoo do a great job. I wasn't trying to say otherwise. I was just saying that both of them depend on volunteers from the community exactly as Extras does.
Extras is still growing and there hasn't been many security issues in the packages that are already there so it's hard to compare response time. But for the packages that we do have, most of them are updated pretty quickly when a new version comes out. Usually with about a day of turn around time.
I'm not sure what you mean by "packages in extras are less equal than the rest". Quite a few of the packages in Extras came directly from Core when they were dropped for Fedora Core 4 and several of those are still maintained by Red Hat because they are used in RHEL (exim comes to mind).
I respect your opinion, but I doubt you'll change my mind. If anything you've made me even more determined. So I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. Who knows... maybe when the test releases for FC5 roll out, you'll be singing a different tune ;).
(Log in to post comments)
Fedora Extras
Posted Jun 18, 2005 11:52 UTC (Sat) by k8to (subscriber, #15413) [Link]
Stating that Debian security updates "rely on community volunteers" is meaningless, since of course the entirety of Debian is constructed by "community volunteers". I suspect that what was suggested by second class status is that the practical results of the handling of the Extras for Fedora Core make them somewhat less well managed than the mainline packages. I am just guessing of course, since I know little of Fedora Core myself.