|| ||James Morris <jmorris-AT-redhat.com>|
|| ||Stephen Smalley <sds-AT-tycho.nsa.gov>|
|| ||Re: New stacker performance results|
|| ||Wed, 25 May 2005 10:55:57 -0400 (EDT)|
On Wed, 25 May 2005, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> - using SELinux as the shared framework and directly integrating them
> into it so that they can leverage its policy abstractions as well and
> serve to reinforce the access controls rather than being redundant.
Given that nobody has come up with an upstream alternative to SELinux
since the merging of LSM, this should certainly be considered.
In fact, there has recently been some discussion about removing LSM
completely and just using SELinux directly.
to post comments)