2.6 isn't vulnerable
Posted May 19, 2005 6:59 UTC (Thu) by komarek
In reply to: 2.6 isn't vulnerable
Parent article: Responding to the kernel ELF vulnerability
Comments and content like this from gregkh, are why I pay for and read LWN. How many slashdot posts would I have to read to get the same information, with the same confidence? Thanks corbet and gregkh for keep us all in-the-know.
to post comments)