|
Eben Moglen's linux.conf.au keynoteEben Moglen's linux.conf.au keynotePosted Apr 25, 2005 23:52 UTC (Mon) by brouhaha (subscriber, #1698)In reply to: Eben Moglen's linux.conf.au keynote by job Parent article: Eben Moglen's linux.conf.au keynote I'm not worried about the GPL becoming more restrictive; as you've pointed out, the "or" clause would allow end users to stick to the older license. But if the GPL became less restrictive, the "or" clause could be a problem. For instance, if I used the "or" clause, and the FSF released GPLv37 which said that the software could be used in military robots with mind control beam projectors without needing the source code to be released, I'd be SOL; there'd be no way for me to retract that permission. Thus I don't use the "or" clause. I don't expect that the FSF will do such a thing, but by not using the "or" clause I can completely avoid the problem. When it turns out that I actually am happy with GPLv3, v4, etc, I can easily enough change over to using them. Eric
(Log in to post comments)
Eben Moglen's linux.conf.au keynote Posted May 5, 2005 21:20 UTC (Thu) by zotz (guest, #26117) [Link] "When it turns out that I actually am happy with GPLv3, v4, etc, I can easily enough change over to using them."
Assuming that you are still alive. There are tradeoffs whichever way you choose to go on this issue. If you care about the future situation after you are gone that is.
all the best,
drew
|
Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.