Previous git

Previous git

Posted Apr 12, 2005 19:47 UTC (Tue) by khim (subscriber, #9252)
In reply to: Previous git by bkw1a
Parent article: The guts of git

What, indeed ?

-rw-r--r--    1 0        0            8751 Jun 06  1996 git-4.3.10-4.3.11.diff.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 0        0           55745 Aug 30  1996 git-4.3.11-4.3.12.diff.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 0        0           76156 Nov 12  1996 git-4.3.12-4.3.13.diff.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 0        0           39461 Dec 05  1996 git-4.3.13-4.3.14.diff.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 0        0           35846 Dec 24  1996 git-4.3.14-4.3.15.diff.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 0        0           12872 Jan 28  1997 git-4.3.15-4.3.16.diff.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 0        0          336211 Jan 28  1997 git-4.3.16.tar.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 0        0          402888 Mar 14  1998 git-4.3.17.tar.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 0        0            5629 Jun 29  1999 git-4.3.18-4.3.19.diff.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 0        0          406138 Jun 01  1999 git-4.3.18.tar.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 0        0           21475 Mar 13  2000 git-4.3.19-4.3.20.diff.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 0        0          406914 Jun 29  1999 git-4.3.19.tar.gz
-rw-r--r--    1 0        0          426648 Mar 13  2000 git-4.3.20.tar.gz

I think we can safely presume it's abandoned. And we already have ACE and ACE, BALSA and BALSA, FUSE and FUSE, etc... So... What is the problem ?

---

(Log in to post comments)