Re: [PATCH] In-kernel module loader 1/7
[Posted October 16, 2002 by corbet]
| From: |
| Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> |
| To: |
| Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de> |
| Subject: |
| Re: [PATCH] In-kernel module loader 1/7 |
| Date: |
| Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:53:26 +1000 |
| Cc: |
| Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
In message <E181Tcc-0003k0-00@starship> you write:
> On Tuesday 15 October 2002 05:25, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > It won't quite work if the hooks can sleep. You can say "don't sleep"
> > or have a wedge which does the "try_inc_mod_count()" then calls into
> > the module (and returns some default if it can't inc the module count).
>
> Right. By coincidence, I found myself thinking about this very problem
> as I re-materialized this morning. If TRY_INC_MOD_COUNT also ors a flag
> (which it does now, for other reasons) then:
>
> 1) Clear the mod_inc flag
> 2) Unhook the function hooks
> 3) Schedule on each CPU
> 4) If the mod_inc flag is set, repeat from (1)
>
> This should perform acceptably well, and would only be done in cases
> where the existing TRY_INC_MOD_COUNT strategy can't be used.
This is basically the same technique used in my current patch. We set
module->live = 0, sychronize_kernel(), then look at reference count.
In this case, instead of setting a flag, try_inc_mod_count (aka
try_module_get()) bumps the refcount, to similar effect to the flag.
> > You can't disable preemption before calling in, because there is no
> > way to sleep with preemption disabled. 8(
>
> Why is that harder than bumping a counter that makes preempt_schedule
> return without doing anything?
Definitely. We could simply allow schedule() to be called when
preempt is disabled, but it's a useful debugging tool to not do that.
And, of course, disabling preemption widely kind of defeats the point
of having a preemptive kernel 8(
I really wish the security guys had gone down the macro path, with
something like
#define security_check(func, default_val, ...)
({ if (try_inc_mod_count(security_ops->owner))
security_ops->func(__VA_ARGS__);
else
default_val;
})
This also allows the whole thing to vanish if
CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=n, and allows more flexibility for
schemes like "always run with preemption disabled around security ops"
or whatever, rather than having to search for all the references to
security_ops.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
(
Log in to post comments)