|
Strange indeedStrange indeedPosted Mar 13, 2005 1:25 UTC (Sun) by stock (subscriber, #5849)Parent article: Is the kernel development process broken?
I admit i still run my AMD64 machine using kernel 2.6.7. Shortly after
(Log in to post comments)
Strange indeed Posted Mar 20, 2005 18:12 UTC (Sun) by wolfrider (guest, #3105) [Link] [[ What i mean by that is, that the old principle of running a stable kernelby downloading a kernel source tree from a stable branch from kernel.org should be restored, and at the same time stop pushing users to the COMMERCIAL Linux distro builders, for running a stable kernel. This is evil in itself. There should be a range of v2.6 kernels on kernel.org which one can rely on, and build a stable kernel from.
So here my wake-up call to Linus Torvalds, to step in and resume the
--I'm with you 100%. The kernel devels should realize that making things simple for the sysadmins is important. Putting New and Funky Shiznit into the kernel is all FWAG (fine well and good) -- but NOT if it makes life harder for the people who are trying to keep up with a stable kernel on their system!!
|
Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.