GFDL does not...
Posted Mar 10, 2005 8:21 UTC (Thu) by jschrod
In reply to: GFDL does not...
Parent article: A day in the life of emacs
You wrote: ``the fact that RMS isn't willing to contribute even more to the cooperation doesn't mean Xemacs is any less at fault for the lack of cooperation.'' (emphasis by me). This was the reaction to the point of
dvdeug who wrote ``I tend to look askance on any claim that all failures to cooperate in the past have been XEmacs's fault.'' With your statement, you made a contradiction to his scepsis and thus supported the concept that the chism is XEmacs's fault.
``any less at fault'' as an answer to ``all failures ... have been XEmacs's fault'' is quite clearly a position, isn't it? And I reacted exactly to that position.
to post comments)