Unstable stable and testing
Posted Mar 5, 2005 0:47 UTC (Sat) by
cricketjeff (guest, #28244)
In reply to:
Debian vs. FreeBSD as a Web Serving Platform, Part 1 by vonbrand
Parent article:
Debian vs. FreeBSD as a Web Serving Platform, Part 1
While I would never use unstable without a great deal of thought on a busy production server it isn't as drastic as the name implies, unstable doesn't mean the packages are flaky just that the versions and dependencies will change quite rapidly. Testing is a third set of archives and is the "new" stable version in waiting and is usually suitable for immediate use, indeed in my last job we served about 3 billion webpages a year from testing boxes. If you need to use the latest software for one or two packages but want stability for the rest Debian has that covered,
apt-get install -t unstable package-name
will pull the package you want from unstable the apt conf file allowing you to specify stable or testing to be your default distribution.
apt-get install -st unstable package-name
would pretend to do the same thing so you can see what extra packages will need to be pulled for unstable so you can decide whether or not to go ahead.
(
Log in to post comments)