| |||||||||||||
There's a problem, thoughThere's a problem, thoughPosted Feb 17, 2005 18:30 UTC (Thu) by kael (subscriber, #1599)In reply to: There's a problem, though by JoeBuck Parent article: A look at CentOS
You forgot to mention Red Hat demanding "Red Hat" be removed from meta tags on the Centos site as well.
As a shareholder of Red Hat, I personally feel persuing this line of action against CentOS is a waste of time and money. Red Hat's value add is service and support, CentOS is certainly not offering the same class of offerings. Or so I believe with the very brief mention of commercial CentOS in the article (that would have been worth persuing).
(Log in to post comments)
There's a problem, though Posted Feb 18, 2005 5:57 UTC (Fri) by dberkholz (subscriber, #23346) [Link] It's not really about whether it's a waste of time, money or whatever. If Red Hat becomes aware of trademark violations, it _has_ to do something about it or risk losing its trademark altogether.
|
|||||||||||||