| |||||||||||||
stable kernelstable kernelPosted Feb 4, 2005 0:48 UTC (Fri) by giraffedata (subscriber, #1954)In reply to: NETIF_F_LLTX and race conditions by melauer Parent article: NETIF_F_LLTX and race conditions Presumably it's an older kernel with backported bugfixes. And that is, incidentally, probably based on 2.4.
(Log in to post comments)
stable kernel Posted Feb 6, 2005 1:17 UTC (Sun) by barryn (subscriber, #5996) [Link] > And that is, incidentally, probably based on 2.4.
Not if you're running any of the following distributions (and some others too):
Fedora Core 2 or 3
2.6 is slowly but steadily taking over...
stable kernel Posted Feb 6, 2005 3:38 UTC (Sun) by giraffedata (subscriber, #1954) [Link] I presume you're saying that the distributions mentioned are providing stabilized 2.6-based kernels, or recommending them, or abandonning support of 2.4-based kernels.But I still maintain that if you find a stable Linux kernel, it's more likely to be based on 2.4, because these 2.6-based ones simply aren't stable in the way we got used to in the 2.4 days. The code in 2.6-based kernels is substantially newer and less exposed than in the 2.4-based ones. I'm still hopeful that the distributions will stick with an old 2.6 level and let it stabilize, but so far I haven't seen the evidence that they will. If they frequently "upgrade" by grabbing all of Linus's recent changes, we'll still have to look to something 2.4-based for any kind of stability.
|
|||||||||||||