| |||||||||||||
IBM's "open source" definitionIBM's "open source" definitionPosted Jan 13, 2005 5:35 UTC (Thu) by torsten (guest, #4137)In reply to: IBM's "open source" definition by ncm Parent article: IBM's patent pledge
Who cares about the 500 they won't sue for, show me the one they are going to sue for.
(Log in to post comments)
show me your ideas! Posted Jan 27, 2005 5:43 UTC (Thu) by xoddam (subscriber, #2322) [Link] Wrong attitude. Here are 500 patents you can read to the greatest levelof detail and *learn* something from, without fear that you'll be sued if you use your knowledge. The patent you *might* be sued for infringing -- you'd be better off not reading.
|
|||||||||||||