News and Editorials
Red Hat 8.0 is out, and already a few gripes have crossed the LWN mailbox.
This latest version has
removed
support for Intel 80486, as was bound to happen sooner or later. It
seems they have also removed the national flag of Taiwan from the KDE 3.0
Control Center. This may well make it easier to do business in mainland
China, but it doesn't create good relations in Taiwan.
Then there were rumors that RH 8.0 is not completely free software anymore.
We checked into that and found that statement to be false. Red Hat has
always included some proprietary software packages in its boxed sets, but
the base Red Hat code is still released under the GNU General Public
License. Looking at the licensing
agreement, we see Red Hat, Inc. trying to protect its trademark. In
order to do this the Red Hat agreement asks those making copies for resale
to modify files identified as "Redhat-logos" and "anaconda-images" to
remove "All use of images containing the "Red Hat" trademark or Red
Hat's shadow man logo".
To make this just a tad more difficult the license also says, "Note
that mere deletion of those files may corrupt the software." This
implies that somewhere in the code there are checks to see that the files
still exist. So the files must be edited to remove these trademarked
logos. However we note that this only applies to those who wish to resell
the distribution without entering into a reseller agreement with Red Hat.
Why would the Linux giant do this? U.S. law takes a "use or lose it"
stance to trademarks. If Red Hat does not defend its trademarks they may be lost.
So Red Hat is taking steps to more vigorously protect its trademarks. Then
consider what happens when a third party modifies Red Hat 8.0 before
resale. If a bug is introduced, Red Hat takes the blame. With the
trademarks removed, Red Hat is distanced from the bug. Since Red Hat
doesn't know what unlicensed resellers are doing with their code, it is
better for them if the end user doesn't see the Red Hat logo. The
restriction also slows down those that download the distribution and make
copies for resale, giving Red Hat a chance a sell a few more copies for
itself. This won't result in big sales for Red Hat, but every little bit
helps.
All in all, the restriction does not seem terribly onerous. Those who
modify Red Hat before resale must edit a couple of extra files. The code
itself is free, and Red Hat maintains better control of what goes out under
its brand name.
Look for a review of Red Hat 8.0 in the review section below, along with
reviews of Libranet 2.7, Mandrake 9.0 and SuSE 8.1 Professional.
Comments (9 posted)
Distribution News
This week's DWN covers the Free Standards Group release of Linux Standard
Base 1.2 (LSB) and asks, 'is anything missing?' Also read about OpenSSL
with CPU optimization; the problematic BitKeeper license; and much more.
Full Story (comments: none)
New Distributions
AbulÉdu
is a Mandrake-based distribution for primary schools. It is currently in
French but most of the tools can be translated. An AbulÉdu server can
handle Mac (netatalk), Windows (samba), GNU/Linux and X terminal (with
LTSP) clients.
Development version 1.0.11 beta 4 features new French-Arabic keyboard
support (you can now use some applications such as Mozilla, write with a
French keyboard, or press AltGr and write with an Arabic keyboard), some
updates, and new features (new mathematical applications and childrens
software).
Comments (none posted)
Minor distribution updates
The
Aurora SPARC Linux Project
announced Build 0.42 (Douglas). This release is primarily for sparc64,
since it fixes a nasty bug that caused disk operations to take 10X as long.
As such, the kernel has been reverted to 2.4.18-1.000sparc.
Full Story (comments: none)
floppyfw has released
2.0.3 with minor security
fixes.
Comments (none posted)
Linux From Scratch has a new
stable release, version 4.0. The list of changes is quite extensive, so
please read the
changelog for the details.
Comments (none posted)
Mindi Linux
has released
v0.66 with
improved logging. Mindi now works around Debian's eccentricities more
effectively and handles DevFS better, too.
Comments (none posted)
Distribution reviews
The Linux Journal
reviews Libranet
2.7.
"
Libranet offers a
straightforward installer, simplified partitioning, automatic
detection and configuration of video and sound, system
administration tools and a well organized selection of
applications, all of which get a generously endowed Debian
installation up and running in short order. And since Libranet
is fully compatible with Debian, it offers fast and reliable
system updates and upgrades."
Comments (1 posted)
Libranet GNU/Linux 2.7 is
reviewed
by Linux Orbit. "
We focused a lot for this review on the desktop
aspects of Libranet GNU/Linux 2.7, since the effort to create an easy to
use desktop Linux distribution has obviously been considerable. But let's
not forget what lies underneath. Libranet 2.7 is based on Debian GNU/Linux
3.0 (now officially "stable"), with Libranet enhancements, like the latest
stable kernel and more. And if you don't need a desktop system, seasoned
Debian users can choose a minimal installation and rely on installing their
favorite server software packages via apt."
Comments (none posted)
The Register
describes a basic
Mandrake 9.0 installation and compares ML9.0 to ML8.2 on a ThinkPad
T20. "
I stick the coaster (CD #1) into the cupholder (CD Drive) and
look at the install screen. It's similar to the one I saw in earlier
Mandrake versions, with its choice of upgrade, rescue or full install. I
choose full install by hitting "Enter." The install begins. Mindlessly, I
click on the default choices as I begin, and partitions are created
automatically, with my 12 GB hard drive split more or less equally between
/ and /home (ext3) partitions separated by a 243 MB swap partition. Nothing
radical, no work to do, no thought required. It has been a while since
partitioning was a concern for new Linux users who chose "commercial"
distributions, and this latest Mandrake has made the partitioning process
literally invisible unless you choose the "expert" option."
Comments (none posted)
The Register
takes a look
at Mandrake 9.0 on the Xbox. "
Mandrake was chosen, according to the
Project, for purely utilitarian reasons. Red Hat is "quite conservative
with its package versions, and we wanted to provide the most modern
distribution available." SuSE doesn't have a GPLed distribution download,
and "Debian isn't the typical distribution for the end user, and besides,
Debian for the Xbox is already available." They also say that of the four,
they found Mandrake ran with the least modifications."
Comments (none posted)
The Register
reviews the installation of Red Hat 8.0 on an IBM ThinkPad laptop.
"
Shock number one was it installed without any hassle. No comments
here on partitioning and dual booting, as I was happy just vaping the
hard drive(which I appeared to have vaped already for some reason anyway), and accepting the defaults."
Comments (7 posted)
LinuxLookup.com
looks
at SuSE 8.1 Professional. "
SuSE software has always impressed me
by the attention to detail they employ in generating their best-in-class
Linux OS. The installation routine is simple and straightforward, the
progress bar (lie meter) is generally accurate, and the finished install is
relatively painless to configure. This release is no different in those
aspects and more improvements have made their way into the finished product
as well."
Comments (none posted)
Page editor: Rebecca Sobol
Next page: Development>>