| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Ed Felten's tinyp2pEd Felten's tinyp2pPosted Dec 16, 2004 16:45 UTC (Thu) by jhardin (guest, #3297)In reply to: Ed Felten's tinyp2p by ccchips Parent article: Ed Felten's tinyp2p
"...many farmers were put off by the notion that ownership of explosives somehow implied intent to harm."
Absolutely.
My belief is that you should be able to possess *anything you want*. The only legally defensible reason to restrict ownership of something is if that thing is dangerous by itself - e.g. certain biological and radioactive materials, where improper storage leads to a significant public hazard.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||