Advertisement
Front, Kernel, Security, Distributions, Development. See your byline here on LWN.net.
| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Debian and the hot babe problemDebian and the hot babe problemPosted Dec 2, 2004 5:03 UTC (Thu) by elanthis (subscriber, #6227)Parent article: Debian and the hot babe problem
"The Debian developers raised the obvious, predictable objection to the inclusion of this utility: the associated images were covered by a non-free license."
Am I alone in thinking this is the funniest thing said in an official LWN.net story so far? ;-)
(Log in to post comments)
Debian and the hot babe problem Posted Dec 2, 2004 6:03 UTC (Thu) by sbergman27 (subscriber, #10767) [Link] No, Jonathans dry humor always cracks me up, and this little gem is definitely a keeper. :-)
Debian and the hot babe problem Posted Dec 2, 2004 6:17 UTC (Thu) by hingo (guest, #14792) [Link] me too!
Debian and the hot babe problem Posted Dec 2, 2004 13:53 UTC (Thu) by WZot (guest, #13623) [Link] Totally agree... And so true :-)
Debian and the hot babe problem Posted Dec 7, 2004 1:02 UTC (Tue) by walters (subscriber, #7396) [Link] Nah, I thought the funniest thing was: "Well, OK, perhaps we can't be too sure with Ubuntu."
|
|
||||||||||||