LWN.net Logo

No, better sender information is still needed

No, better sender information is still needed

Posted Sep 28, 2002 20:09 UTC (Sat) by giraffedata (subscriber, #1954)
In reply to: A Bounty on Spammers (CIO Insight) by jschrod
Parent article: A Bounty on Spammers (CIO Insight)

>This contact information can be used to track the spammer down by
>law enforcement.

This misses the point of the article, that enforcement would be done by private individuals (with the help of civil courts), and the point of the comment, which is that this means private individuals would have to have more information about other people than perhaps they should have.

I don't see anything wrong with having an anonymous email option. As with the properly labelled advertising emails, I would route all my anonymous email to a bin where I would scan it quickly every day or two, while leaving my regular mailbox open for mails that deserve my full and immediate attention. Much as my telephone routes anonymous calls to voicemail.

(I have email routing like that set up today, but due to the lack of clear labelling, it uses a formula that sometimes routes important email to the bulk bin).


(Log in to post comments)

Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds