| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Conectiva, Mandrakesoft, Progeny, and Turbolinux form consortiumConectiva, Mandrakesoft, Progeny, and Turbolinux form consortiumPosted Nov 17, 2004 15:26 UTC (Wed) by jensend (guest, #1385)Parent article: Conectiva, Mandrakesoft, Progeny, and Turbolinux form consortium
UnitedLinux Lite: now with 75% less backstabbing!
(Log in to post comments)
Conectiva, Mandrakesoft, Progeny, and Turbolinux form consortium Posted Nov 17, 2004 16:50 UTC (Wed) by gduval (guest, #11868) [Link] Oh we should have thought about such comments...! More seriously: please understand that the goal here is not to promote one Linux standard like UL tried to do. LCC's goal is to promote *the* Linux standard - LSB & its extensions - by maintaining an implementation of this standard, and work on interoperability, for instance by solving package management issues due to differences between DEB & RPM (for instance).
Conectiva, Mandrakesoft, Progeny, and Turbolinux form consortium Posted Nov 17, 2004 20:38 UTC (Wed) by JoeBuck (subscriber, #2330) [Link] Unfortunately LSB 2.0 is completely broken as far as C++ is concerned.
Conectiva, Mandrakesoft, Progeny, and Turbolinux form consortium Posted Nov 18, 2004 0:21 UTC (Thu) by danielthaler (guest, #24764) [Link] No standard is perfect. If thats its only problem, then LSB is doing fine.
|
|
||||||||||||