Weekly Edition Return to the Announcements page |
Is Open Source the new cell phone?
Or Internet? Or Operating System? Flash forward to 25 years from now – will we look back in disbelief at a time when people didn't completely trust Open Source? When all of the dominant technologies in our lives are built on Open Source models (if they aren't already) what will the history books say about the slow adoption rates of Open Source at the turn of the century? The answer won't be available for some time, but what we can do is examine the question. Results from a survey conducted by VA Software Corporation (NASDAQ: LNUX) has revealed that executive resistance to Open Source may be hindering greater adoption of Open Source development methods for internal software development. As a result, many enterprises are failing to capitalize on the benefits of Open Source development processes and techniques. While the majority (87%) of respondents said they used at least some Open Source tools (such as CVS), technologies (such as Apache or Linux) or development techniques (such as network-enabled collaborative development) within their organization, 43% of them believe that resistance from senior management is the greatest barrier to adopting more Open Source development processes in the enterprise. Furthermore, nearly four out of ten (38%) said their executive team either does not understand or does not trust Open Source. A lot has been written about where Open Source is and what it can do - another question to consider: where could (or should) it be? A highlight of the statistics is featured in the press release below. More//... Executives Should Open Minds to Open Source Development Techniques VA Software survey shows enterprises need education to reap efficiency benefits of Open Source development practices FREMONT, California — November 15, 2004 — A survey by VA Software Corporation (NASDAQ: LNUX) has revealed that while Open Source tools, technologies and techniques are used in a majority of enterprises, executive resistance to Open Source may be hindering greater adoption of Open Source development methods for internal software development. As a result, many enterprises are failing to capitalize on the benefits of Open Source development processes and techniques. VA Software, a leading provider of software, information and community support for IT managers and development professionals, recently polled 176 engineers, managers, directors and executives.1 The majority (87%) said they used at least some Open Source tools (such as CVS), technologies (such as Apache or Linux) or development techniques (such as network-enabled collaborative development) within their organization. When asked what specific Open Source techniques they use for internal development, 54% cited collaborative development, 37% said they conducted continuous integration and testing, while just 36% said they reuse existing assets in a manner similar to Open Source development projects. More than half of the respondents (57%) believed that the main benefit of adopting more Open Source development processes and techniques is improved software quality, while 45% cited increased productivity and efficiency, and 35% said lowered costs. However, despite these benefits, 43% of respondents believe that resistance from senior management is the greatest barrier to adopting more Open Source development processes in the enterprise. Furthermore, nearly four out of ten (38%) said their executive team either does not understand or does not trust Open Source. "IT and development professionals widely acknowledge the effectiveness of more agile, collaborative development methods as practiced in the Open Source community," said Colin Bodell, senior vice president and CTO, at VA Software "Meanwhile, the demonstrable success and quality of Open Source applications like Linux, Apache and JBoss have proven that Open Source development techniques allow widely distributed groups to efficiently produce enterprise-class solutions." Bodell added, "This survey suggests that many of today's software development challenges could be solved by applying more Open Source techniques in the enterprise. However, misperceptions and mistrust of Open Source at the executive level is preventing many enterprises from more fully embracing these techniques and their associated benefits. Clearly ienterprises need more education if they are to overcome today's most pressing development challenges." The survey also asked respondents about their primary development challenges When asked why development projects go over budget (as they do more than half of the time for 46% of firms), the majority (53%) cited changing requirements or goals as the leading cause, followed by setting unrealistic targets (27%). Additionally, 56% said they work longer hours and 63% said they feel more stressed than a year ago. While many attribute these challenges to competitive pressures and cost constraints, the third most common cause (20% of respondents) was the increasingly distributed nature of their development organizations. In this survey, 74% reported that their development organization spanned more than one physical location and 17% had development spread across more than 20 physical locations. Distributed development is known to present numerous challenges in terms of team communication, collaboration and coordination. VA Software has published a free white paper to help businesses adapt and leverage best practices of the Open Source development model for internal software development. Entitled, "`Leveraging Open Source Processes and Techniques in the Enterprise," the paper is available from the company's website at www.vasoftware.com. (Log in to post comments)
Is Open Source the new cell phone? Posted Nov 16, 2004 0:46 UTC (Tue) by XERC (guest, #14626) [Link] I guess, that it depends on the management.
If the management consists at least 50% of people
I know it from practice. :) Life is not all that bad! :)
Is Open Source the new cell phone? Posted Nov 16, 2004 9:35 UTC (Tue) by philips (guest, #937) [Link] Yes. And most importantly, executives are not always knowlegeable enough to now internal infrastructure.Fresh example. My company officially do not support, do not use Linux. At all. Well, okay. Firewall runs Linux with maquerade. Webserver is SUSE with Apache. All print servers are run under Linux. As in my current company, development of development process is stalled mainly by cygwin/cvs & bunch of proprietary Windoz-only tools (from WindRiver). Still most employees are using Emacs as their primary IDE. One hell of a mix.
So probably another day you will come to new company, and find that your new desktop run WinXP under Boch under Linux ;-)))
Is Open Source the new cell phone? Posted Nov 16, 2004 9:36 UTC (Tue) by philips (guest, #937) [Link] And obviously exec on interview will be ensuring you that company do not use Linux. At all.
Is Open Source the new cell phone? Posted Nov 16, 2004 11:06 UTC (Tue) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] XP under Bochs under Linux? Impressive: a way to make XP run even slower than it does already. ;}
Is Open Source the new cell phone? Posted Nov 17, 2004 9:32 UTC (Wed) by druiloor (guest, #26069) [Link] XP under Bochs under Linux? Impressive: a way to make XP run even slower than it does already. ;}
Maybe use QEMU instead:
Is Open Source the new cell phone? Posted Nov 16, 2004 22:58 UTC (Tue) by XERC (guest, #14626) [Link] Most of our workstations are Windows only,but all of them use reanVNCto access Linux and Linux based Sun GridEngine.
Is Open Source the new cell phone? Posted Nov 17, 2004 9:58 UTC (Wed) by Krakow (guest, #26070) [Link] Have you tried FreeNX yet? Once you use it you can kiss goodbye to VNC. Too slow.
Is Open Source the new cell phone? Posted Nov 17, 2004 10:03 UTC (Wed) by druiloor (guest, #26069) [Link] Some time ago, i overheard a phone call to our department (ICT) allong the lines of:
Yes, we do use this "Linux thing" you talk about. As a matter of fact you have had a Linux powered machine on your desk for the past two years or so. However your desktop actually runs on a Citrix farm (which is MS-Windows) and most any button you press there fires off some kind of "frontend" (to: database, terminal-server, X clienthost, or whatever) again running Unix. Well, we configured it this way - so users wouldn't notice. Yeah if your kid wants to check this out, have him hit Crtl-Alt-F1/-F7. Cheers.
Free Software development methods less applicable to IT Posted Nov 22, 2004 19:14 UTC (Mon) by Max.Hyre (subscriber, #1054) [Link] Obviously (to most of us :-), running Free Software in the corporation is a no-brainer. Developing with the same methods is another thing. Free-Software developers are a self-selecting lot. If you need a given capability, or a particular project really appeals to you technically, you go do what you want. It doesn't work that way in IT. The project selection is slender---only what looks needed or advantageous to some set of management. Usually, you don't even get to choose from that set. Additionally, release early and often ain't gonna happen when corporate income and reputation are on the line. Admittedly, personal reputation is involved in Free-Software development, but that reputation can be enhanced even when you make a mistake, so long as you recognize and fix it promptly. Customers, on the other hand, don't like that treatment. One saving grace is that developers will try to sign on with companies whose work appeals to them, ensuring that they may have some minimum level of satisfaction. But it's still nothing like the Free-Software world, and can never be.
|
Copyright © 2004, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.