Partitioned loopbackdevices
Posted Nov 11, 2004 7:16 UTC (Thu) by
Duncan (guest, #6647)
Parent article:
Partitioned loopback devices
This is an interesting solution indeed.
A couple months ago, my attention was drawn abruptly to this partition
issue. As luck would have it, I had just decided to forgo SATA for
another upgrade round and stick with PATA for one more generation, so it
wasn't me. However, someone else on the Gentoo AMD64 list ran into the
entirely predictable problem, attempting to upgrade his SATA disks from
the old IDE side SATA drivers to the newer SCSI side SATA drivers. A good
portion of his partitions were suddenly unreachable!!!
Unfortunately, there wasn't much to tell him except to go back to the old
kernel and drivers at least long enough to grab the data from the extra
partitions, store it elsewhere, and repartition into fewer partitions. I
DID thank him, however, for pointing out the problem to this guy who had
decided to wait another upgrade cycle for SATA, due to a general feeling
that I was already pushing the envelope enough with newer AMD64 gear, and
running ~amd64 (Gentoo uses ~ to denote unstable/beta, altho it's supposed
to have been tested past alpha at least), and that I didn't want to gamble
any further with as yet unstable driver implementations for SATA on TOP of
the other leading/bleeding edge stuff I was running.
Anyway, it would have been very useful to have this solution available in
the kernel at that time, such that with a couple additional configuration
tweaks, he'd have been on his way. Barring some sort of magic and SCSI or
at least the SATA-SCSI subset, developing >16 partition support by the
time I DO switch, hopefully this solution WILL be in the mainline kernel
by then and decently widely deployed and documented. As it happens, I've
20 partitions now, on my 250G PATA, and that's with ~100G still
unpartitioned. It's possible I'll have mid-20s partitions by upgrade
time, and be ready for even MORE, on what I expect by that time will be my
new half terabyte or larger drive. (Or drives, if I go RAID by then, as I
might.)
Maybe this'll serve at a bit of a heads-up to some others, thinking about
upgrading to SATA, as well. It could certainly add a bit of unexpected
complexity to your upgrade, if you aren't ready for it and have the 20-ish
partitions I do.
Duncan
(
Log in to post comments)