Microsoft's protocol license agreement [LWN.net]

Microsoft's protocol license agreement

Posted Nov 8, 2004 5:49 UTC (Mon) by petegn (guest, #847)
Parent article: Microsoft's protocol license agreement

It'is high time the courts took decisive action against M$ Corp once and for all i am getting sick of seeing them try to make yet another grab for something else they dont own and stand no chnace of owning like the M$ Mouse actually not theres at all but stolen from someone else and the whole windowing system not theres at all but an idea knicked off someone else even MS DOG not there but a re-work of another well known system paid $10,000.00 my aunt fanny as like .

It is also time for a total and complete audit of ALL M$ Corp code bases to see just how much code they have stolen from the Open Source Communitity, We have pussy fotted around with them enought now time to go for the Jugular lets sort them out once and for all end this crap NOW ..

Pete .

(Log in to post comments)

Microsoft's protocol license agreement

Posted Nov 8, 2004 11:17 UTC (Mon) by mmarq (guest, #2332) [Link]

" We have pussy fotted around with them enought now time to go for the Jugular lets sort them out once and for all end this crap NOW .. "

For that you have to breack the grab on Hardware Industry, that M$ holds tight, and that way with the majority of Hardware Industry on Open Source side, win the desktop... and with that the CE world!

For that to happen, perhaps the *majority* of changes would have to happen in Kernel, not userland... thought the hotplugging enable device driver model in 2.6/2.7 is in the right way!... its clearly not enough.

Microsoft's protocol license agreement

Posted Nov 8, 2004 16:45 UTC (Mon) by gvy (guest, #11981) [Link]

*please* don't smoke *that* before speaking publicly