| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Fake Red Hat security updateFake Red Hat security updatePosted Oct 25, 2004 13:41 UTC (Mon) by haydentech (guest, #22504)Parent article: Fake Red Hat security update
I swear, if any scammers ever bothered to learn correct English grammar or the art of spellchecking, we'd all be in trouble. Fortunately, they seem obstinately opposed to those ideas.
(Log in to post comments)
Fake Red Hat security update Posted Oct 26, 2004 0:35 UTC (Tue) by Ross (subscriber, #4065) [Link] Or learn how to companies write their own name, or bother to even make themessage remotely similar to real Red Hat advisories. If they were smart they would have made the "update" an RPM. I see no reason not to and the fact the patch was a tarfile with a Makefile and a script would be plenty to tell it is fake by itself.
Fake Red Hat security update Posted Oct 28, 2004 8:43 UTC (Thu) by lacostej (subscriber, #2760) [Link] doesn't red hat sign their packages? If so a fake RPM would have been detected.
Fake Red Hat security update Posted Oct 29, 2004 21:52 UTC (Fri) by giraffedata (subscriber, #1954) [Link] They're not opposed, they just aren't very smart.It's fortunate for society that the Hollywood criminal mastermind is largely a myth. Most criminals are stupid; smart people have other avenues available to achieve their goals (good job, etc.).
|
|
||||||||||||