Sponsored link
Vyatta –
Linux & Open Source
Alternative to Cisco –
Advanced Routing,
Firewall, VPN, QoS..
Free Download ->
| |||||||||||
MonoMonoPosted Oct 21, 2004 8:03 UTC (Thu) by walles (subscriber, #954)In reply to: Mono by ncm Parent article: A couple of applications from your future desktop
On the other hand, the only way to turn Mono into a stable, mature runtime environment is for people to develop apps on top of it, find problems with it and have them fixed.
Even gcc wasn't very good to begin with.
(Log in to post comments)
Mono Posted Oct 21, 2004 8:21 UTC (Thu) by ca9mbu (subscriber, #11098) [Link] > On the other hand, the only way to turn Mono into a stable, mature runtime> environment is for people to develop apps on top of it, find problems with > it and have them fixed.
Which is why this quote from the original article:
> Among other things, it seems there are memory leak problems in Mono which
strikes me as very odd. Why work around the problem at all? If the guys developing beagle have found a memory leak, why can't they report it and have it fixed upstream so it can be fixed and they don't need to work around it at all?
Mono Posted Oct 21, 2004 22:51 UTC (Thu) by massimiliano (subscriber, #3048) [Link] In fact the memory leaks are being fixed...
Mono Posted Oct 21, 2004 17:16 UTC (Thu) by ncm (subscriber, #165) [Link] Why bother making the Mono runtime stable and mature at all? Maturity isn't really needed for prototyping, and just interferes with the process of transitioning those prototypes to a real language.
Mono Posted Oct 22, 2004 7:02 UTC (Fri) by walles (subscriber, #954) [Link] That's a circular argument.
You're saying that since Mono isn't mature, it isn't good for anything but prototyping. And since it's only good for prototyping, why should it be made mature?
The answer is of course that *if* Mono should become stable and mature it would be good for other things than prototyping. And since it would then be good for other things than prototyping it would need to be stable and mature :-).
As is explained on "http://www.go-mono.com/languages.html", your definition of a "real" language would have to be quite uncommon to be able to find a language that couldn't potentially be run by Mono.
|
|||||||||||