|
Red Hat Releases RHEL 4 Public BetaRed Hat Releases RHEL 4 Public BetaPosted Sep 30, 2004 10:20 UTC (Thu) by tzafrir (subscriber, #11501)Parent article: Red Hat Releases RHEL 4 Public Beta
A couple of questions, if I may:
I recently tried installing Centos 3.3 (a RHEL 3 recompiled clone). The installer made a silly mistake with the X configuration and X refused to load: simply got stuck, getting 100% CPU. I eventually got over the problem (by a small manual edit to XF86Config), bvut on my way there discovered that:
* redhat-config-xfree requires an X server to run(!)
* X -configure did not give a working configuration.
* A text-based Xconfigurator was not around anymore.
* xf86cfg was not part of default installation, if at all present.
So for a non-guru user the system would have been inconfigurable without
Are there any improvements in that front?
Other notes:
CVS vs. Subversion:
uw-imap vs. cyrus:
lvm2:
Does it default to install LVM, like FC3?
(Log in to post comments)
Red Hat Releases RHEL 4 Public Beta Posted Sep 30, 2004 13:04 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] LVM2 works fine on a system with LVM1 volumes; in fact, it takes manual intervention to migrate the volumes to use LVM2 metadata (so migrating to a 2.6 kernel is not a point of no return :) )
Red Hat Releases RHEL 4 Public Beta Posted Sep 30, 2004 14:44 UTC (Thu) by rmini (subscriber, #4991) [Link] uw-imap vs. cyrus:uw-imapd has a less-than-stellar security history, whereas cyrus has the benefit of not running as root (the most that will get compromised is the mail).
Red Hat Releases RHEL 4 Public Beta Posted Sep 30, 2004 20:02 UTC (Thu) by smoogen (subscriber, #97) [Link] dovecot is available on the RHEL-4 I am pretty sure. The case where cyrus vs. uw-imapd is on large sites where scalability and speed are seen more as an issue.
Red Hat Releases RHEL 4 Public Beta Posted Sep 30, 2004 23:00 UTC (Thu) by bronson (subscriber, #4806) [Link] ...and I suppose I'll handle the Subversion question.
Personally, after a few days of use, I find SVN every bit as straightforward to manage as CVS. The new FSFS backend (in 1.1, released today) uses filesystem permissions, and does away with the database hassles (and there are many: requires write access just to read the repository, stale locks, dump/restore, dedicated server, ...). FSFS is a little green, but it appears entirely usable today.
Definitely give SVN a look.
Red Hat Releases RHEL 4 Public Beta Posted Oct 1, 2004 13:49 UTC (Fri) by hppnq (guest, #14462) [Link] And that leaves the X problem. ;-)I definitely see improvement, I hardly ever have trouble configuring X nowadays. The problem you describe sounds more like a small bug that slipped in somewhere than a sign that X configuration is in a deplorable state. Most of the times it Just Works, and if it doesn't, there are lots of places where people can turn for support -- you don't need to be a guru to solve simple problems.
Red Hat Releases RHEL 4 Public Beta Posted Oct 7, 2004 17:29 UTC (Thu) by marcw (guest, #25271) [Link] 1. X
X configuration does not require a working X config as before.
2. CVS vs. Subversion:
Subversion 1.0 does not use existing filesystem permissions. There
The CVS client included in RHEL 4beta1.
3. uw-imap vs. cyrus:
Don't know why they did this. Guess you'll have to build your
4. LVM2
LVM2 can read LVM1 volumes. LVM1 volumes can be converted to LVM2
I did a fresh install on my internal disk with my external disk
Red Hat Releases RHEL 4 Public Beta Posted Oct 7, 2004 17:30 UTC (Thu) by job (subscriber, #670) [Link] I second the dovecot recommendation. No shared folders support yet,otherwise perfect.
|
Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.