| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Rebuttal by a Linux kernel developerRebuttal by a Linux kernel developerPosted Sep 25, 2004 14:20 UTC (Sat) by hppnq (subscriber, #14462)In reply to: Rebuttal by a Linux kernel developer by gregkh Parent article: A Sun engineer on Linux Here is Mr Schrock's answer to your rebuttal, just for completeness' sake. It is not really worth reading, just a lot of misinterpretation. He also describes his view on the GPL, on the same page. It shows that he doesn't understand the first thing about the GPL and the Open Source community.
(Log in to post comments)
Round 2 by a Linux kernel developer Posted Sep 26, 2004 16:50 UTC (Sun) by gregkh (subscriber, #8) [Link] Thanks for letting me know. And here is my response.
Round 2 by a Linux kernel developer Posted Sep 26, 2004 21:47 UTC (Sun) by hppnq (subscriber, #14462) [Link] Thanks Greg, for a very polite and to the point response -- I thought Eric's piece was, again, deliberately inflammatory, even though he did have a couple of valid points.I'm looking forward to your article on binary compatibility. ;-)
Round 2 by a Linux kernel developer Posted Sep 27, 2004 1:38 UTC (Mon) by Tao (guest, #24985) [Link] hppnq,
Do you understand the words "deliberately inflammatory" and "troll"?
Tao
Round 2 by a Linux kernel developer Posted Sep 27, 2004 6:57 UTC (Mon) by hppnq (subscriber, #14462) [Link] Get off my back.
|
|
||||||||||||