Free software survives the original copyright holder
Posted Sep 2, 2004 8:25 UTC (Thu) by
hingo (subscriber, #14792)
In reply to:
Free software survives the original copyright holder by gdt
Parent article:
Pointless ideology?
And what of the moral aspects of ignoring the author's explicit wish?
What about it? The guy knowingly releases code under the GPL. He knowingly goes
against the hottest debated kernel policy by secretly smuggling in hooks to be used by a
binary-only module. And now we should abandon some GPL code, because he asks for
it. If you ask me, Linus and Greg have been bending over backwards for a guy that was
only out to screw them.
In any case, I've understood that one good reason to pull the driver, is that it's not wise to
have code hanging around that doesn't have a maintainer. So when somebody picks up
this piece of abandoned GPL code and offers it back to the kernel, it will be included
again. At least that what I read on kerneltrap.
(
Log in to post comments)