Linux in the news
All in one big page
See also: last week's Back page page.
PHP hackers may want to have a look at PHP Builder, a news and how-to site oriented around the PHP language.
Kernel hangman. For those of you with too much free time... Jeff Dike has put up a Kernel Hangman game on the User-mode Linux site. See if you can guess some obscure kernel symbol before it's too late...
Section Editor: Jon Corbet
November 9, 2000
Two years ago (November 12, 1998), Digital Creations released the source code for their Principia dynamic web content platform. The Principia project has since been renamed as Zope and it is being used widely. Two years later, Digital Creations believes that open-sourcing its product made good business sense.
A second internal Microsoft memo, now known as Halloween II, was brought to light. This followed close on the heels of the original Halloween Document. The second memo mentioned strategies for dealing with Linux and shed more light into some of the strategies that could be used against Linux.
What Microsoft justly fears is that open-source will expose the illusion on which its revenues depend. Along with Apache and Perl and sendmail and the innumerable other achievements of the open-source community, Linux demonstrates that no one need pay for excellent software. Ironically, many of Microsoft's loyal customers find this far too good to be true. They probably always will. This shouldn't be a problem; many Flat Earthers and Creationists lead happy and productive lives.
One year ago (November 11, 1999), RedHat and Oracle announced a collaborative distribution based on RedHat Linux that was intended to be aimed at high volume e-commerce sites.
U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson's findings of fact revealed that Microsoft had a monopoly in the operating system business. In the ruling, Linux was written off as a viable alternative:
Fortunately for Microsoft, however, there are only so many developers in the world willing to devote their talents to writing, testing, and debugging software pro bono publico.... It is unlikely ... that a sufficient number of open-source developers will commit to developing and continually updating the large variety of applications that an operating system would need to attract in order to present a significant number of users with a viable alternative to Windows.
Publicly traded Linux stocks jumped up in price after the announcement. Cobalt Networks fortuitously chose this week to go public, and immediately jumped to $130/share - then the third biggest opening day "pop" ever.
Rumors circulated that Red Hat would buy Cygnus - these turned out to be true.
Journaling for ReiserFS was released by Hans Reiser. Another Journaling filesystem, Stephen Tweedie's ext3 version 0.0.2c filesystem was released.
The freeze of Debian 2.2 was pushed back - until January of 2000. That seemed like a long time away, but the eventual 2.2 release was even further away.
Letters to the editor should be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org. Preference will be given to letters which are short, to the point, and well written. If you want your email address "anti-spammed" in some way please be sure to let us know. We do not have a policy against anonymous letters, but we will be reluctant to include them.
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 07:29:58 -0700 From: Bruce Ide <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Playing Devil's Advocate While the recent Microsoft network compromise was significant, we should keep in mind that most security problems originate from people who are not security conscious. Though a solid operating system helps, it's not an end-all solution. It doesn't take much browsing of the LWN Security Section to get a feel for just how vulnerable a given distribution of Linux is out of the box. Although it may not be particularly succeptable to remote attacks, local users will typically find it to be pretty trivial to gain root access. And of course the first thing Joe Random Newbie does once installing his Linux box is to offer all his IRC friends accounts on his system. And it blows his mind when he finds out later that his machine has been used to trade live goat porn for the past year and a half. Now using a system like Linux will help a bit, if for no other reason than it keeps your servers from getting virusses. The security problems we're seeing now will not go away until both programmers and users adopt a "Security First" mind-set. On a side note, the current anti-cracking legislation goes about this in entirely the wrong way. It'll lull users and administrators into a false sense of security and draw out the entire process. It's foolish at best and dangerous at worst. -- Bruce Ide email@example.com
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 09:44:38 -0600 From: Kevin Breit <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Subject: Linux's security Greetings, The Linux community is definatly interested in the situation that Microsoft was cracked. Most of our rebuttal is "Ah! See, this is where Linux shines." While I agree that the open source model is much more secure than the closed-source model, I don't feel that Linux shines in the security category. Granted, Linux gets much more secure when not all services are installed and set to go in init.d. But do we really need to look at a simple find statement to find out that we have way too many suid applications that don't need to be? What I feel needs to be done is that the distributions need to take some time and take security seriously. They need to look at all their suid apps, and make them have the correct permissions. Have default installs have /tmp as its own partition and have noexec nosuid on that partition. I know that the Linus and Co. think it's nazi-admin, but enable wheel group on Linux distributions by default. Linux is probably more secure than Microsoft's respective operating systems are. But Linux definatly doesn't touch OpenBSD's quality in regards to security, and I feel it's arguable that it has some catchup to do with FreeBSD. Even if we may never hit OpenBSD's security standard, I feel it's a goal we should all strive for. This would allow us to say, without a doubt, that Linux would do a better job than Windows. Sincery, Kevin Breit
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 15:40:47 +0800 From: Frank Horowitz <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Subject: Time warp.... Dear editors, In your "Two years ago" section of "This week in history..." in LWL of 2 November 2000, you state Supercomputing 1998 hosted Beowulf talks for the first time. Just to be pedantic, a full year earlier, I attended a daylong "Build you own Beowulf" session in the short-courses preceeding the SC'97 meeting in San Jose. This was complete with a 130-odd node cluster on the exhibition floor (which performed the first teraflop computation on a Beowulf, IIRC), and Donald Becker debugging drivers for a new ethernet chipset "on the fly". So, umm, I guess that should have been in its own "three years ago" section. Off-by-one errors will never go away :-) Cheers, Frank Horowitz -- Dr. Franklin G. Horowitz; Principal Research Scientist; firstname.lastname@example.org CSIRO Exploration & Mining, PO Box 437, Nedlands, WA 6009, AUSTRALIA Tel.(08)9389-8421 (Int'l +61 8 9389 8421), FAX (08)9389-1909 (+61 8 9389 1906)
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 16:32:11 -0600 From: James Crouchet <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Advice on patents This note concerns your story about LinuxWorks possibly patenting loadable modules. I think the writing is on the wall, and I encourage you to move immediately to protect the intellectual property you yourselves so often employ. Specifically: --- 1. The use of symbols which represent, either separately or in combination, various sounds. 2. Combinations of such symbols to form complete modules. Each module is represented by one or more series of sounds as drawn from it's component symbols. Each module also possesses one or more definitions. 3. Combinations of the defined modules is used to express and record ideas, concepts, queries commands and other sorts of communication. The items described here are know as: 1. Letters 2. Words 3. Language --- I would also encourage you to extend free usage rights for these technologies to those who publish software, books, plays and other communications using the open source model. Though you might want to specifically restrict it's use by those who hold software patents. James Crouchet
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 10:55:20 +1030 To: email@example.com Subject: Transmeta coverage Hello folks at LWN, I like LWN, a lot. Your coverage of the Linux scene is excellent. But what's this obsession with Transmeta, a hardware component manufacturer? It's not even an open source project: they are yet to even publish the opcodes of their long instruction word microcode. The only link I can find it that it employs one Linus Torvalds and lets him work on Linux. But Transmeta is hardly the only company that allows its staff to contribute to open source projects. Your current coverage is probably most unfair to developers of the competing Alpha processor, who have been significant and continuous contributors to the development of Linux. I don't mind the occassional "Where is Linus now?" article but breathless reporting of every Transmeta happening is too much. Regards, Glen -- Glen Turner Network Engineer (08) 8303 3936 Australian Academic and Research Network firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.aarnet.edu.au/ -- The revolution will not be televised, it will be digitised